← Market Personality

Market Personality · Report

BTC — Bitcoin Futures

BTC is in a mean-reverting state — moves fade, ranges hold, breakouts get sold. This is the environment where fading extremes historically works. We built this read from 37 years of BTC daily data.

Archetype: Working Range

 

Archetype verdict

Bitcoin Futures is a Working Range market right now — the archetype label is how the full 37-year read of its personality rolls up into one tag. Clean oscillation at normal vol. Mean-reversion books pay here.

Three readings drive that call (all scored against BTC’s own history, not against other markets):

  • Volatility: Normal — 63rd percentile — in the typical band
  • Trend strength: Mean-Reverting — 28th percentile — medium-term persistence runs low (shorter memory)
  • Tail risk: Clean — 50th percentile on kurtosis — no fat-tail shocks piling up
Vol regime
Normal
Trend regime
Mean-Reverting
Tail regime
Clean
What to do with this read
  • If you’re a mean-reversion trader: This is your environment. Range-fading and overbought/oversold signals carry more weight here than during trend regimes.
  • If you’re a trend trader: Breakouts get faded. Wait for a Hurst move above 0.5 or a vol-regime shift before committing to trend systems.

Live BTC signals · Feature glossary · Personality map

DNA radar

This radar chart is BTC’s fingerprint today. Each of the six spokes measures one trait of the market — how strongly it trends, how volatile it is, how fat its tails are, and so on — ranked against BTC’s own 37-year history. A big spike on one spoke means BTC is unusually strong on that trait right now. The overall shape is the market’s personality at a glance.

BTC DNA Radar

5-year trajectory

Today’s radar is only one frame. This strip shows four frames — 5 years back, 2 years back, 1 year back, and today — so you can see BTC’s personality evolve over time. All four use the same yardstick (BTC’s full history), so any change in the shape is a real change in the market, not a change in how we’re measuring it. The label under each frame is the archetype we called at that time.

BTC 5-year personality trajectory

How to read it: a growing polygon means the market is heating up on those traits. A shrinking polygon means it’s cooling off. Big label changes between frames (e.g. Healthy Trend → Full Crisis) are the real regime shifts worth paying attention to.

Current-state scorecard

Here’s the full read — all 16 traits we track, measured over four lookbacks (1 year, 2 year, 5 year, lifetime). Each number is a percentile: how today’s reading ranks against this market’s own history over that window. BIG 6 tags the six traits that drive the radar chart above. Use the arrow column to see whether each trait is rising, flat, or falling vs its 2-year distribution.

Feature Current 1-year pctile 2-year pctile 5-year pctile Lifetime pctile Trend
Medium-term persistence (Hurst)BIG 6

~0.5 random-walk-ish; higher = long-memory; NOT a next-day trend signal
0.57 40th 40th 35th 28th →
Volatility (annualized)BIG 6

daily swing size, annualized
42.8% 40th 31st 46th 63rd →
Volatility of volatility (VoV)BIG 6

low = steady vol, high = regime change coming
0.32 85th 88th 68th 47th ↑
Tail fatness (excess kurtosis)BIG 6

0 = normal, >3 = fat tails, >6 = crisis tails
+2.61 96th 98th 72nd 50th ↑
Tail direction (skew)BIG 6

negative = downside shocks worse than upside
-0.30 24th 12th 26th 41st ↓
Predictability (sample entropy)BIG 6

low = patterns repeat, high = noise
0.32 4th 16th 29th 41st ↓
Trend vs chop (5-day) (variance ratio)

>1 = trending, <1 = mean-reverting
0.81 62nd 41st 17th 18th ↓
Trend vs chop (20-day) (variance ratio)

>1 = trending, <1 = mean-reverting
0.89 85th 80th 53rd 51st ↑
Mean-reversion speed (OU half-life, days)

days for a shock to decay by half
85d 72nd 76th 74th 77th →
Trend vs range test (ADF p-value)

>0.10 = still trending, <0.05 = range-bound
0.99 100th 100th 100th 100th ↑
Day-to-day momentum (lag-1 autocorrelation)

positive = trend-continuation, negative = snap-back
-0.13 16th 28th 14th 19th →
Price-path roughness (fractal dimension)

~1.0 clean trend, ~1.5 noisy, ~2.0 chaotic
1.53 27th 52nd 79th 86th →
Volatility stickiness (GARCH persistence)

near 1 = vol hangs around, <0.9 = vol fades
0.97 33rd 66th 84th 73rd ↑
Cycle clarity (spectral entropy)

low = dominant cycle, high = no clear rhythm
0.92 88th 94th 72nd 57th ↑
Price-vol link (leverage correlation)

negative = vol spikes on selloffs (normal), positive = squeeze
-0.05 65th 82nd 56th 45th ↑
Worst drawdown (rolling max drawdown)

deepest peak-to-trough drop over the window
-50.0% 30th 15th 22nd 15th ↓↓

← swipe horizontally on mobile to see all columns.

Trend column: ↑↑ strongly rising vs 2-year distribution, ↑ rising, → flat, ↓ falling, ↓↓ strongly falling. Thresholds are 0.5 and 2.0 standard deviations. Percentile ranks use the full lifetime distribution — a 70th-percentile reading means today is higher than 70% of all observed days. The 1-year column uses only ~252 days and should be read as a short-term signal, not a precise rank.

Markets like this

These are the three markets whose long-run personality most resembles BTC — same temperament, not necessarily same direction. We compare each market’s 37-year fingerprint on the Big-6 traits, standardized so markets at different price scales can be compared fairly. Important: “personality peer” is not the same as “price peer.” Two markets can trade in lockstep and have totally different personalities, and vice versa.

The distance number is a similarity score. Smaller = more alike. NG at 2.05 is a close cousin; NQ at 2.85 is a more distant relative. Under the hood: each market’s Big-6 traits are averaged over its full history, z-scored across the 18-market universe (winsorized at ±2.5σ so a single extreme market can’t pull the geometry), then compared with Euclidean distance. Short-history markets (BTC) have more sample uncertainty in their lifetime mean — treat them as lower-confidence matches. See the full map on the personality clusters page.

Recent signals

These are the archetype-sequence patterns whose forward-return behavior has survived a per-market empirical test on BTC. When a transition matches one of these patterns, history shows a reliable short-to-medium-term edge on this market. Signal narratives, horizons, and historical Sharpe come from an in-house 37-year backtest; see how signals are tested.

Crisis recovery
Volatility normalizing

Violent-Range volatility is easing into a normal Working Range — the stress event is fading.

5-day bullish forecast · historical Sharpe +0.22
Most recent triggers on BTC (1 lifetime)
2025-08-31 Violent Range → Working Range
Volatility build-up
Compression setup

Quiet Range tightening into Coiled Calm — volatility is compressing, often before a directional resolution.

21-day bullish forecast · historical Sharpe +0.58
Most recent triggers on BTC (1 lifetime)
2023-09-30 Quiet Range → Coiled Calm

Signals are historical; past performance does not guarantee future results. These are not trade recommendations — they are the empirically-validated patterns we watch for on this market.

Macro lens

Separate from the per-market pair signals above, these are findings where BTC‘s personality archetype carries information about an external macro regime — an inflation print, a yield-curve inversion, a drought. These are empirical “when this market’s personality looks like X, that external macro regime tends to follow” findings — context signals, not trade recommendations.

Macro lens
Crypto read on Fed liquidity

When Bitcoin consolidates into a Coiled Calm archetype, the Fed slips into effective easing (negative shadow rate) within six months 57% of the time — nearly double the base rate.

When BTC is in Coiled Calm, Fed easy-money regime (Krippner US shadow rate < 0%) follows within 6 months  ·  57% vs 31% baseline (lift 1.84x, n=47 months)

Bitcoin’s Coiled-Calm regime is the single strongest conditional archetype during Fed easy-money periods (2.01× lift). The logical direction suggests crypto compresses into tight ranges as rates grind lower — followed by directional breakouts when liquidity gets juicy. Context signal for the macro backdrop driving crypto flows.

During active fed easy-money regime (krippner us shadow rate < 0%), BTC most often shows (over/under its own base rate)
Coiled Calm2.01x
Healthy Trend1.08x
Violent Range1.05x
Coverage 2018-12 to 2026-05 · 199 months total, 57 in regime · Source: KRIPPNER_SHADOW_RATES_MONTHLY (country_iso3=USA)

Past co-movement does not guarantee future results. Macro-lens entries are context signals — not trade recommendations.

37-year history

Three ways to look at BTC’s full 37 years of personality. First chart: every Big-6 trait over time, with the “normal range” shaded in cream and the big macro events (crashes, policy pivots, crises) marked. Second chart: the whole 37 years compressed into one map so you can see how the market has moved through regime-space. Third chart: a month-by-month color calendar of which archetype BTC was in — scroll it like a weather map of the market.

Coverage: 2018-12-18 to 2026-05-22 · 1,870 daily observations.

Feature history

One panel per Big-6 trait, over all 37 years. Hover any point for the exact reading. Drag the bar at the bottom to zoom into a specific era (e.g. 2008, 2020). The cream band is the p10-p90 envelope — the middle 80% of all-time readings. Treat it as a “normal zone” with a caveat: markets with fat tails routinely visit the extremes, so a value outside the band isn’t anomalous, just historically unusual. Triangles along the top mark major market events (structural breaks — crashes, policy turns, war); hover to see each one.

Loading data…

Personality map

This map shows where BTC has lived over 37 years. The shaded region is a density map — darker patches are where the market has spent most of its time. The labeled circles (1990s, 2000s, 2010s, 2020s) are decade medians, color-matched to time (navy = early, gold = recent). The gold diamond is today, with the exact reading. Left-to-right is how strongly the market was trending (right = more trend, left = chop). Up-down is how volatile it was vs BTC’s own history (0 = quiet, 100 = extreme). Read it as: is today close to where the market usually lives, or at the edge of unfamiliar territory?

Loading data…

Regime calendar

Every month of BTC’s life, labeled as one of 12 personality types (combinations of volatility, trend, and tail risk). Each color is one archetype — the legend below the chart ranks archetypes by how much of the history the market has spent in each. Hover any band to see the exact month and archetype. Triangles are the same macro-event annotations from the first chart.

Loading data…

Methodology

The 16 traits. We group them into four families (click any underlined term for a quick definition):

  • Trend traits (does the market keep going in one direction?): Hurst exponent (R/S estimator), variance ratios, ADF p-value, OU half-life, lag-1 autocorrelation.
  • Volatility traits (how big are the daily swings, and are they sticky?): annualized vol (std dev of daily log returns, rolling 252-day window, scaled by √252), vol-of-vol, GARCH(1,1) persistence.
  • Shape traits (are the tails fat? which side are shocks on?): skewness, excess kurtosis (Fisher), leverage correlation.
  • Complexity traits (is the price path noisy or clean? do cycles repeat?): sample entropy, spectral entropy, fractal dimension, rolling max drawdown.

How we pick the archetype. Three pieces — volatility level, trend strength, tail risk — combine into a 12-box grid of personality types. We use BTC’s own history (not a cross-market ranking), so a quiet market and a wild market can both be scored fairly against themselves. The classifier reads exactly three of the sixteen traits (Hurst percentile, annualized-vol percentile, kurtosis percentile) through hand-set thresholds. The other 13 traits inform the scorecard but not the archetype label.

How to read a percentile. “70th percentile vol” means today’s vol is higher than 70% of BTC’s own history — NOT higher than 70% of other markets. Every number on this page is scored against BTC itself. Cross-market comparisons live on the personality clusters page.

Caveats worth knowing.

  • Percentile series look ahead. Readings on the feature-history chart are ranked against the market’s full lifetime, including data after the x-axis date. A 2008 reading at the 90th percentile is high relative to what we now know of history, not relative to what was known in 2008. This is a snapshot characterization, not a point-in-time rank series.
  • The archetype classifier reads only 3 of 16 traits. Features like skewness, entropy and the complexity family feed the scorecard but not the label.
  • Hurst is a structural measure, not a daily-trend signal. Hurst > 0.5 indicates long-memory in the 252-day rolling return series — useful for characterizing regime. It does NOT reliably predict positive next-day return autocorrelation. Our in-house empirical test on 37 years × 18 markets found no such link. Don’t read a “trending” Hurst label as a day-trading signal.
  • Rule-based classifier. Thresholds are hand-set. The classifier does not learn from alert performance (that lives in TA Profile).
  • Short-window instability. 1-year percentiles use ~252 days; on recently-listed markets (e.g. BTC) they are noisier than lifetime stats. Read the Lifetime column when confidence matters.
  • Rolling windows lag sharp breaks. Expect feature readings to lag sharp regime breaks by a few bars.
  • Event markers are hand-curated. The triangles on the feature history and regime calendar are macro-event annotations, not the output of a change-point detection algorithm. Alignment between an event and a visible shift on the chart is for reference, not a statistical claim.

Full plain-English definitions for every feature in the Feature glossary.

Related

  • Market Personality hub — back to the market index.
  • Personality clusters — both the structural map and today’s state map across all live markets.
  • Feature glossary — plain-English definitions for all 16 features.
  • Live risk-state detector (Phase 4 continuous stress score) — coming soon.