Full rankings · Report
Full-Term Ranking
Every president since Herbert Hoover ranked across up to 24 economic + market metrics. The headline is the fair comparison — only terms sharing a full data set — but the full 28-term table is here too, with a clear read on which cohorts win where.
Last updated November 07, 2026
The fair comparison — only terms sharing a full data set
Mean rank across 15–24 economic + market metrics (SPX, 10Y yield, HPI, nonfarm payrolls, CPI, unemployment, real wages, kitchen-table grocery prices, LFP, savings rate, 30yr mortgage). Only the 12 terms since Carter are shown — terms before 1977 had incomplete coverage of several series (e.g., trimmed-mean PCE starts 1978, kitchen-table CPI starts 1984), so they are excluded from this apples-to-apples comparison. Lower mean rank = ranks better on more metrics. Minimum metrics for inclusion: 15.
All 28 completed terms since Herbert Hoover
The widest possible sample. Terms before the 1970s had fewer metrics available, so their mean rank is less robust — read the metric-count column with that in mind. Every data point is sourced from either FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) or BLS; the series names, release cadences, and database tables are listed in Methodology below.
Split by who the metrics help most
The 24 metrics split naturally into three cohorts based on who benefits from them. A president might rank near the top for asset holders and middle for ladder climbers, or vice versa. Both pictures are real; neither alone is the whole story.
Asset holders
Metrics owners benefit from: equity returns, house-price appreciation, bond-yield levels, credit spreads.
Ladder climbers
Metrics working-age wage-earners benefit from: payroll growth, real wages, LFP, construction + leisure jobs, mortgage affordability, savings rate.
Everyone
Metrics that cut across both cohorts: headline + core inflation, unemployment, food/energy CPI, kitchen-table grocery prices.
In progress — Trump II notional rank
Trump II is currently 656 days into his second term and holds a notional mean rank of 11.41 across 22 of the 24 metrics. Treat that number with the asterisk the data deserves: Cumulative growth metrics (CPI, payrolls, SPX cum, etc.) are mechanically lower over a partial term, biasing the notional rank in favor of low-direction metrics and against up-direction metrics. Read with care.
Methodology + the 24 metrics
How the ranking works. For each metric, rank the terms 1 through N where 1 is the best outcome under the metric’s better-direction convention (up = higher is better, down = lower is better, mixed = context-dependent). A president’s overall score is the mean of their ranks across all metrics they have data for. Lower mean rank = better overall standing.
Why the “fair” table is the headline. Older terms (FDR, Hoover, Coolidge) have 2–5 metrics available vs 20–22 for post-Carter terms. A 2-metric mean is noise; a 22-metric mean is a signal. The fair cut requires at least 15 metrics so every term is being judged on a comparable set.
Data sources. All series pulled from presidential_performance.db (59 MB, local SQLite). Upstream: FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) for macro + markets + inflation; BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) for employment + wages; BEA for GDP-adjacent series. Refreshed nightly by the Presidents project orchestrator.
The 24 metrics (cohort · dimension · metric · unit · better · n terms with coverage):
Related reports
- Same Days in Office — ranks on only the days every president has already reached, so Trump II is compared on day 300 not day 1,460.
- Trump vs Biden — Matching Window — head-to-head on identical calendar quarters.
- Have You Been Better Off? — the 1980 Reagan question computed across every president.
- Back to Presidential Performance library
