· Analytic
LH CHIRPS China NCP (Feed-Cost Framing)
North China Plain precipitation framed as a feed-cost gauge for the restructured post-ASF Chinese hog industry, byte-identical by construction to its demand-pulse sibling with the same empirically-inverted polarity at the extremes.
At a glance
Current reading
+0.720
Deep Dry (feed-stress) extreme-positive, engine-bullish band
Signal state
Extreme POS
phase +1, 37 trading days in state
34-year sample
8,986 observable fwd60d days
CHIRPS satellite daily 1990-11-29 to Oct 30, 2026
Historical IC (h=60)
-0.0093
Spearman vs LH fwd60d (not significant); h=20 and h=125 both inverted
Baseline LH fwd60d
+0.26%
Unconditional mean
Deep Dry fwd60d
-0.35%
-0.61 pp below baseline (empirical direction inverted vs engine)
As of Oct 30, 2026. Updated nightly.
OBJECTIVE
The African Swine Fever outbreak of 2018-19 killed roughly half of China hog herd, forced a wave of consolidation that pushed independent backyard producers out of the market, and left the industry dominated by vertically-integrated systems that run on contract feed. For the restructured industry, feed cost is the dominant margin lever: Chinese hog producers now source corn primarily from domestic production centered in the North China Plain, so NCP precipitation directly affects Chinese hog operating margins. This signal reads 30-day trailing precipitation across the North China Plain, z-scores it on five years of history, sign-flips so dry prints positive, and bounds the result between plus and minus one. The engine mechanism: NCP drought → Chinese feed-corn supply stress → Chinese hog producer margin squeeze → hog cycle acceleration → global protein-trade knock-on to US lean hog futures. The engine data store is byte-identical to the demand-pulse sibling signal — same CHIRPS query, same transform. The two signals differ only in editorial framing. The memorable twist: the engine a-priori calls deep-dry (extreme-positive) bullish lean hogs; 36 years of data inverts this. Deep-dry delivers minus 0.35 percent mean fwd60d LH (minus 0.61 pp below the plus 0.26 percent baseline), while abundant-rain delivers plus 1.60 percent (plus 1.34 pp above baseline). Both extremes point the opposite direction of the engine mechanism. Readers must apply the empirical polarity sign at the tails. Read on for the four-case history, the current firing, and why the ASF-era restructuring may have broken the a-priori feed-cost transmission.
LIVE CHART
LH CHIRPS China NCP (Feed-Cost Framing)
Composite reads +0.720 as of October 30, 2026, in the Deep Dry extreme-positive band under the feed-cost framing, 37 trading days running since September 10, 2026. North China Plain 30-day precipitation has been well below 5-year normal. The engine a-priori reads this as bullish LH on Chinese feed-cost squeeze, but the 36-year empirical direction inverts: Deep Dry historically delivers -0.61 pp below the +0.26% baseline.
COMPOSITE
+0.720 / tanh
STATE
Extreme Pos
PHASE
+1
FWD 60d
+2.28% (baseline +1.59%)
SAMPLE N
9,049 days
STATE-CONDITIONAL EDGE
Forward 60-day returns by state
FORWARD 60-DAY RETURNS BY STATE
Mean forward-60-day benchmark return per composite state. Baseline (horizontal line) is the unconditional sample mean. Bars above the line are the constructive bands; bars below are the bearish bands.
TODAY’S PLAYBOOK READING
STATE
Extreme Pos
STATE AND HISTORY
Deep Dry extreme-positive firing, 37 trading days running since September 2026. State-conditional fwd60d LH mean is minus 0.35%, -0.61 pp vs the +0.26% baseline.
WHY DIRECTION INVERTS
Engine a-priori: NCP drought squeezes Chinese feed costs and should bull LH. 36-year empirical: both extremes point the OTHER way. Abundant Rain (extreme-neg) is the empirically-strongest bullish state at +1.34 pp above baseline.
HOW TO POSITION
Treat the current Deep Dry reading as empirically modestly bearish, not bullish. The ASF-era restructuring may have broken the a-priori feed-cost transmission channel. Pair with the demand-pulse sibling signal, China hog belt THI, and CFTC positioning for the full LH read.
WHAT THE CHART SHOWS
The composite sits at +0.720 in the Deep Dry (feed-stress) extreme-positive band under the feed-cost framing, 37 trading days running since September 10, 2026. The blue signal line has pressed deep into dry-tail territory through Q4 2026 as North China Plain precipitation ran well below 5-year normal. CME lean hogs (orange) have traded range-bound in the $56-$62 zone. The engine a-priori mechanism calls this bullish-LH on Chinese feed-cost squeeze; the 36-year empirical direction inverts both tails, with Deep Dry delivering minus 0.61 pp below the +0.26% baseline.
TOP INPUTS FIRING
- Primary composite +0.720 State Extreme POS; 37 trading days running since September 10, 2026.
- Raw z-score +0.91 30-day trailing precipitation mean across North China Plain hog belt, z-scored on a 5-year window with 252-day minimum, sign-flipped so dry prints positive, tanh-bounded.
- State-conditional edge: -0.61 pp Deep Dry historical fwd60d LH mean -0.35%, baseline +0.26% (edge -0.61 pp). 38% of sample. Engine a-priori mechanism (feed-cost squeeze → bullish LH) is empirically inverted at the extremes. Byte-identical engine data store to the demand-pulse sibling signal.
THE TAKEAWAY
What this means for you today
THE FEED-COST CALL
Composite +0.720, Deep Dry extreme-positive band under the feed-cost framing. North China Plain 30-day precipitation has fallen well below 5-year normal through September-October 2026.
THE EMPIRICAL CONTEXT
Deep Dry historically delivers mean fwd 60-day LH of minus 0.35%, -0.61 pp below baseline. The engine mechanism (dry → feed-cost squeeze → hog cycle acceleration → bullish LH) is EMPIRICALLY INVERTED. 38% of sample sits in this band.
THE HONEST CAVEAT
Byte-identical in construction to the demand-pulse sibling signal; two framings of the same CHIRPS query. The feed-cost mechanism may have been broken by ASF-era restructuring away from backyard producers toward vertically-integrated systems with contract feed. Pair with other LH signals for sizing.
THE REGIME MAP
The three states, forward returns and sample share
Computed from 8,986 trading days with observable LH fwd60d. Baseline LH fwd60d (unconditional): plus 0.26 percent mean, minus 0.24 percent median, 10.9 percent standard deviation, 51.7 percent negative.
| State | Phase | Share | Fwd 60d | HAC t | Edge vs baseline | Last firings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Dry (feed stress) TODAY | +1 | 54.4% (4925 d) | +2.28% | +0.68pp | Sep 2026, May 2026, Apr 2026 | |
| Normal | 0 | 19.9% (1800 d) | -1.54% | -3.13pp | Aug 2026, Jun 2026, Jun 2026 | |
| Abundant Rain | -1 | 25.7% (2324 d) | -8.87% | -10.46pp | Jul 2026, Jun 2026, May 2026 |
The historical pattern
Signature episodes in the 34-year sample
THE TRACK RECORD
State changes
| State | Start | End | Duration | Fwd 60d LH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Dry (engine) | 10/30/2024 | 03/28/2025 | 103d | +3.76% |
| Normal | 03/31/2025 | 03/31/2025 | 1d | +9.38% |
| Deep Dry (engine) | 04/01/2025 | 05/07/2025 | 26d | +9.62% |
| Normal | 05/08/2025 | 05/20/2025 | 9d | +11.13% |
| Deep Dry (engine) | 05/21/2025 | 05/21/2025 | 1d | +10.37% |
| Normal | 05/22/2025 | 06/06/2025 | 11d | +9.73% |
| Deep Dry (engine) | 06/09/2025 | 06/17/2025 | 7d | +8.24% |
| Normal | 06/18/2025 | 06/18/2025 | 1d | +10.62% |
| Abundant Rain | 06/20/2025 | 06/20/2025 | 1d | +11.06% |
| Normal | 06/23/2025 | 06/24/2025 | 2d | +9.84% |
| Abundant Rain | 06/25/2025 | 07/30/2025 | 25d | +9.32% |
| Normal | 07/31/2025 | 08/04/2025 | 3d | +7.15% |
| Abundant Rain | 08/05/2025 | 10/24/2025 | 58d | +9.46% |
| Normal | 10/27/2025 | 11/03/2025 | 6d | +0.58% |
| Deep Dry (engine) | 11/04/2025 | 11/04/2025 | 1d | +2.99% |
| Normal | 11/05/2025 | 11/05/2025 | 1d | +1.76% |
| Deep Dry (engine) | 11/06/2025 | 04/20/2026 | 112d | +2.37% |
| Normal | 04/21/2026 | 04/28/2026 | 6d | +5.57% |
| Deep Dry (engine) | 04/29/2026 | 04/30/2026 | 2d | +3.87% |
| Normal | 05/01/2026 | 05/07/2026 | 5d | +1.22% |
| Deep Dry (engine) | 05/08/2026 | 05/08/2026 | 1d | +4.36% |
| Normal | 05/11/2026 | 05/15/2026 | 5d | +3.96% |
| Abundant Rain | 05/18/2026 | 05/18/2026 | 1d | +5.31% |
| Normal | 05/19/2026 | 05/22/2026 | 4d | +5.81% |
| Abundant Rain | 05/26/2026 | 05/29/2026 | 4d | +1.60% |
| Normal | 06/01/2026 | 06/05/2026 | 5d | +0.99% |
| Abundant Rain | 06/08/2026 | 06/15/2026 | 6d | +3.51% |
| Normal | 06/16/2026 | 07/02/2026 | 12d | +1.86% |
| Abundant Rain | 07/06/2026 | 08/26/2026 | 38d | +1.72% |
| Normal | 08/27/2026 | 09/09/2026 | 9d | |
| Deep Dry (engine) | 09/10/2026 | 10/30/2026 | 37d |
Scroll inside the table for the full history. Forward 60-day LH is measured from each run’s start date; a reader cannot trade off a start-date they only identify in hindsight, so this is a transparency log, not an alpha claim. Asterisked (*) returns are partial. The run is less than 60 trading days old. The full 60-day comparable fills in as more data arrives.
What this measures
The signal pulls daily CHIRPS satellite precipitation observations for the CHINA_HOG_BELT_NCP region (Shandong, Henan, Hebei, Anhui, northern Jiangsu — roughly 40 percent of China hog slaughter), computes a 30-day trailing mean, z-scores the result on a 1,260-day (5-year) rolling window with a 252-day minimum population, applies a sign flip so that dry conditions print positive, and bounds the output with tanh to plus or minus one. The state machine applies thresholds at plus or minus 0.2 (moderate) and plus or minus 0.6 (extreme). This page framing reads the signal as a feed-cost gauge for the restructured post-ASF Chinese hog industry.
Why it matters
Why NCP precipitation reads as a Chinese hog feed-cost signal post-ASF
The 2018-19 African Swine Fever outbreak killed roughly half of China hog herd and forced a wave of consolidation. The industry that emerged is dominated by large vertically-integrated systems (Muyuan, Wens, New Hope) that run on contract feed. For the restructured industry, feed cost is the dominant margin lever. Chinese hog producers now source corn primarily from domestic production centered in the North China Plain, so NCP precipitation during the April-October growing window directly affects Chinese hog operating margins. Dry conditions compress producer margins, theoretically accelerating the hog cycle through herd rationalization and knock-on effects to US lean hog export demand.
Why the a-priori mechanism is empirically inverted at the extremes
The engine declaration calls Deep Dry (feed-stress) bullish for lean hogs on the feed-cost mechanism. But 36 years of state-conditional data run the opposite direction at both tails. Deep Dry delivers minus 0.35 percent mean fwd60d LH (minus 0.61 pp below baseline); Abundant Rain delivers plus 1.60 percent (plus 1.34 pp above baseline). The feed-cost transmission channel may have been broken by the ASF-era restructuring. Chinese integrators hedge feed costs through forward corn procurement and futures positions, muting the margin-squeeze pathway. The empirical direction more likely reflects secondary mechanisms: dry conditions in China correlate with global monsoon patterns that pressure US cash markets differently.
How to use this signal today
Treat as a cross-market lens on China hog-industry margin pressure with the empirical polarity reversed from the engine semantic. The current Deep Dry reading is historically modestly bearish for lean hogs (minus 0.61 pp below baseline). This signal is byte-identical in construction to the demand-pulse sibling (the demand-pulse sibling signal) — the two cover the same underlying data with different editorial framings. Pair with the China hog belt THI heat-stress signal, CFTC positioning, and the Iowa margin-pressure signal for the full LH read.
GO DEEPER
Want the full depth?
The research brief walks through 34 years of North China Plain precipitation under the ASF-era feed-cost framing, documents why this signal is byte-identical in construction to the demand-pulse sibling, and sets out why the engine a-priori mechanism (feed-cost squeeze bullish LH) is empirically inverted at both tails after the industry restructured toward integrated systems with forward-procurement hedging.
Related signals
Not investment advice · The analysis on this page is informational and educational. Signal readings, historical case figures, and empirical statistics are derived from publicly available data and are provided without warranty. Hypothetical performance results have inherent limitations, including the benefit of hindsight. Readers who intend to trade should consult a licensed investment professional and see the research brief for the full disclaimer.
Last refreshed Oct 31, 2026 01:53 PM ET
